Energy exploration has led to fragmentation of habitats worldwide. In boreal forests of Alberta, Canada narrow clear-cut linear disturbances (3–14 m wide) called seismic lines are often the largest local source of forest fragmentation. Many lines have failed to recover decades after their creation leading to changes in forest dynamics and biodiversity. In some cases, these linear features function as habitat and/or corridors for species, while being detrimental in other species, most notably the threatened woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou). Recently, industry and government have focused on reforestation of these lines using silvicultural treatments and tree planting. However, these applications are expensive (> $12,500/km) and do not account for wildfires that can destroy restoration investments (planted trees), yet also initiate early seral conditions that favor natural recovery. Here, we examined soil compaction (bulk density) and tree regeneration density in burnt and unburnt seismic lines within mesic upland forest types and compared these to adjacent (paired) forest controls. Bulk density on seismic lines increased by 34% compared to undisturbed adjacent forests, but was not severe enough to impede regeneration. Despite increases in compaction, regeneration density was 19% higher on lines than in adjacent forests. Specifically, regeneration density averaged 19,622 stems/ha in burnt lines, 11,870 stems/ha in unburnt lines, 16,739 stems/ha in adjacent burnt forest, and 6,934 stems/ha in adjacent unburnt forest where regeneration rates are expected to be lower. We suggest that leave-for-natural recovery (passive restoration) of seismic lines can be expected post-fire in mesic upland forests with even the majority of unburnt seismic lines recovering to densities above the 5,000 stems/ha guidelines. Active restoration treatments using intensive silviculture treatments should therefore only be considered where recovery is not observed or wildfire likely.