Techno-economically reasonable mechanization of tree planting has proved to be a difficult task in the Nordic working conditions. Although planting machines and combinations of base machine and planting device have been developed since the 1970s, mechanized planting has not been cost-competitive to manual planting. The aim of this study was to find out work time distributions, productivities, costs and effects of different work difficulty factors on productivities and costs of the state-of-the-art Nordic planting devices, Swedish Bracke and Finnish M-Planter, and to compare the devices with each other. The theory of comparative time studies was the base for the experimental design of this study. In the average working conditions, productivity (E15) of M-Planter (236 seedlings/hour) was 36.0% higher than that of Bracke (174 seedlings/hour). Here, M-Planter performed planting work 23.4% cheaper than Bracke. However, the difference depended greatly on the working conditions; the more stones or stumps the smaller the difference, and the more slash the bigger the difference.
Related Resources
A Strong Mitigation Scenario Maintains Climate Neutrality of Northern Peatlands
Resource Date:
January
2022
Organization
Soil and Water Nutrients in Stem‐only and Whole‐tree Harvest Treatments in Restored Boreal Peatlands
Resource Date:
August
2020
Organization
The Biophysical Climate Mitigation Potential of Boreal Peatlands During the Growing Season
Resource Date:
October
2020
Organization
Warming Impacts on Boreal Fen CO2 Exchange Under Wet and Dry Conditions
Resource Date:
March
2019
Soil Deformation and its Recovery in Logging Trails of Drained Boreal Peatlands
Resource Date:
May
2019
Was this helpful?
|