Boreal Caribou Health Monitoring Guidance Repository

Resource Date:
July
2024

This webpage centralizes the best available information related to Boreal Caribou Health Monitoring. Note: some resources shared in the list below focus on caribou designatable units other than boreal caribou. We choose to include them in this repository as case studies; these might provide a source of inspiration and lessons learned. 

Opinions and suggested future directions from members

This webpage is managed jointly by the National Boreal Caribou Knowledge 
ConKnowledge sharing iconsortium's Monitoring Working Group (MWG) and Caribou Health Knowledge Network (CHKN). MWG or CHKN members have shared the following perspectives. Members who shared these insights asked to remain anonymous.

Why is it important to monitor an individual’ caribou's health?

  • "Early warning signs. For example, matted fur or hair loss could mean the caribou has ticks."
  • "Monitoring of a few individuals may give clues about the rest of the herd."

Why is it important to monitor a population’s health, as compared to an individual’s health?

  • "Caribou health is intimately linked to human and environmental health."
  • "If every jurisdiction were to collect baseline caribou health data, in the absence of having 30 years to get reliable datasets, we could use space for time comparisons/ assessments to infer trends from one population to another."

What is the value of including wildlife health monitoring in existing monitoring programs? 

  • "We gain a better understanding of the overall system (trophic cascades, reproductive health, etc.)"
  • "Information on the health of the individual can (if done properly) be used to infer the health of the herd."

Who should be involved in monitoring caribou health? Are there restrictions on who can collect biological samples?

  • “Observations of fur condition and animal behaviour might be collected by anyone, but collection of certain kinds of samples do need to be collected by trained personnel.” 
  • "It is always helpful to collect samples, but it’s better if the samples are collected in a proper/standardized manner.”
  • "Note that there is a difference between mortality investigations vs healthy harvest-based sampling vs live animal sampling."

At what scale do we collect information related to health? Is health monitoring usually done opportunistically?  

  • "Great question and not an easy answer. Ideally, there would be implications at the population-level, but this often depends on having years of consistent data from individual animals, including sample collection and analysis with a comparison of "healthy" animals to "unhealthy" animals and an understanding of causes of morbidity and mortality."

If you could share one message about monitoring caribou health, what would that be?Knowledge mobilization icon

  1. Collaboration is critical "We need to break out of the ‘silo’ approach to health monitoring: the current approach is to have wildlife health monitoring as its own program, but we should be pushing for wildlife health monitoring to be part of a ‘regular’ monitoring program."
  2. Long-term datasets are invaluable "We need to move away from small, isolated 1-2 year funding projects. To interpret data with the most confidence, it is much better to have long-term datasets, ideally spanning 30 + years. That said, one workaround to this challenge is that if all the areas sample their caribou, and then when we get a spatially rich dataset, we can quickly compare one population to another with more of a background understanding."
  3. Guidance is desired "From an environmental impact assessment perspective, we tend to monitor individual caribou. It would be nice to know what the options are, in terms of the health monitoring methods, that we can add to our existing baseline data programs."
  4. There is no one 'catch-all' method "In our area, one of the things that's important to us, is to be clear in terms of what is the minimum for baseline data, and then provide choices to [our practitioners] on what to sample, based on the additional questions they are hoping to answer."
  5. Interpretation should be done with care "We need to make it clear that collecting comprehensive health metrics (samples/evidence/data) is relatively quick, but that the interpretation should be done with care, as misinterpretation and/or inappropriate extrapolation of results is possible"
  6. Call on your local experts for help "Readers should call on their local wildlife health experts to help, [especially] before inferring information."

CaSE STUDIES: Canadian Resources and projects

CaSe STUDIES: International resources and projects

Field Guides, Protocols, Educational tools, and visuals

Contacts with expertise on boreal caribou health monitoring
  • Coming soon!

More information & Version History

Explore the complete CCLM collection of caribou health monitoring resources by clicking here

Learn about the National Boreal Caribou Knowledge Consortium by clicking here

Should the reader have any questions about this page, or have any resources they would like to add to this page, kindly contact the NBCKC Secretariat. 

Page launch: November 21, 2024